October 28, 2008

Cut The Fat: How Hollywood is Adjusting to the Recent Economy

Two posts ago, I talked briefly about the current state of Hollywood in the midst of the economic crisis that we are in, but focused primarily on the split between Paramount Pictures and DreamWorks SKG. This week, I have decided to focus on the larger economic affects on Hollywood, and how the entertainment industry is being shaken up in every sector, from major studios to independent film festivals. As stocks and quarterly figures alike continue to fall, companies are making serious changes in order to counter their projected losses. Jeff Zucker, CEO of NBC Universal (seen right), has decided to cut $500 million from next year’s budget, despite profits in its last eight consecutive quarters. The figure will constitute a total of three percent of operating expenses for 2009, and the major cuts will be in three areas: discretionary spending, promotion expenses, and staffing. Zucker was quoted in a memo stating to his workforce, “We are living in a time of unprecedented economic challenges, and it is increasingly clear that the worldwide economic slowdown will continue into next year.” I agree wholeheartedly with Zucker’s quote, and believe that most of the recent cutbacks in the entertainment industry are due to the grim projections of 2009. In addition, it seems that the cutbacks most companies are making are primarily in the number of projects being produced, especially in the independent film market, and the advertising and marketing campaigns of new or current projects. I believe it is in the best interest of studios and production companies alike to cut the fat on extraneous endeavors and projects for the next few years, and focus on the tent-poles that will bring in enough revenue to sustain these companies through this rough period. Unfortunately, other aspects of the industry may not be so fortunate.

In the past month, several major independent film distributors and production houses have been completely shut down by their parent companies. Warner Brothers eliminated two of their independent, albeit successful production companies, Warner Independent and Picturehouse. Paramount Pictures absorbed most of its staff at its specialty division, Paramount Vantage, as well as terminating fifty of its employees. These businesses were not extraneous ventures started by the studios during some boom, producing small films no one had heard of. For example, Paramount Vantage was responsible for, among many other noteworthy titles, There Will Be Blood and Into the Wild, two of this past year's nominees for Best Picture. Aside from those in the independent film sector, even big studio films that have been slated for a release date have been pushed back in the attempt of conglomerates to minimize losses for 2008. One primary example of this is Paramount’s film, The Soloist (pictured left), starring Jamie Foxx and Robert Downey Jr., which has been delayed to March of 2009, instead of its initial November 21st, 2008 release date. The decision was made because Paramount did not have the budget to support the film’s advertising and marketing campaign, which included an Oscar campaign for the Best Actor and Best Picture category. Research shows that the delays on this film alone will save Paramount $60 to $70 million in prints and advertising costs. Along with The Soloist, vice chairman of Paramount Pictures Rob Moore said last week that it was “cutting costs by reducing the number of films released each year from about 25 to 20.” While Paramount will lose the revenue of these five films, this cutback seems to be a safe, and even timely decision. Moore went on to explain that unless the split with DreamWorks was made, Paramount would have a difficult time reducing its production count to twenty films per year. The split also created the opportunity to make other potentially lucrative deals, including an agreement with Marvel Studios to distribute all four of its films that will be released through 2011. As we have seen with the success of Iron Man in both the box office and DVD sales, the distribution deal seems to be a very smart move for Paramount.

One can imagine that if these major studios and production companies are minimizing costs as much as possible, smaller film festivals around the country, including the Jackson Hole Film Festival and the Santa Barbara Film Festival, are really feeling the brunt of it all. Due to insufficient funds, these festivals have been forced to shut down. According to one studio exec, “Outside of Cannes, Berlin, Sundance, and Toronto we’ve never acquired a film at another festival. And in terms of tracking talent, anything that generates heat comes back to L.A. anyway.” It seems that without celebrity backing garnering enough publicity, many of these events are losing corporate sponsorships, which account for most of the festivals’ budgets. Not only are cutbacks being made everywhere in the film industry, but costs are also being minimized in the television world across the board. NBC’s Knight Rider, ABC’s Private Practice, and FOX’s Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles have all been slated for nine more episodes apiece, despite mediocre to poor reviews and ratings. If this were last year, let alone five years ago, these shows would have been cancelled and a new show would have taken their place. However, “given the cost of producing and marketing a new scripted series,” companies like NBC Universal “might have a greater temptation to give a show like ‘Knight Rider’ more time to find an audience.”

Due to the recent economy, aside from job security, stock-market crashes, and everything else we have to worry about, audiences around the country are going to have to worry about quality of entertainment and media for the next year, as almost all mediums are minimizing their content and rate of production due to the decreasing stock value of the major conglomerates that control the output of entertainment for the majority of the country. Whether it be in film, television, or the independent arena, audiences will not be available to the maximum potential of the industry for the next year. However, this downside is the only option the industry has in a time like this, and Hollywood will bounce back when the time comes. Every industry needs to play it safe these days, and Hollywood should be no different.

October 14, 2008

The Biz 101: A Look At 20 Industry Related Websites And Blogs

In today’s post, I have decided to highlight 20 websites and blogs that I believe encompass all aspects of the entertainment industry, on both the business and production side. All of the sites chosen are not only quality sources of information, but also follow the Webby and IMSA criteria. For up-to-date news and/or reviews on current or new films, I would recommend Ain’t It Cool News, JoBlo, and Rotten Tomatoes. Ain’t It Cool News fares more on the side of news and not reviews, but the site is incredibly up-to-date, filled with relevant and engaging content, and usually supports its articles with new and interesting pictures or videos. However, some negative aspects of the site are the visual design (very basic, and has no pictures on the front page), and the news is primarily devoted to big studio films and remakes. JoBlo.com has a much larger scope, including reviews, trailers, and even a schedule of release dates. It’s very easy to navigate, and visual design is great, but some of the articles are not always from a prominent source. I think the layout of the site could be improved upon, especially the balance of pictures and text. The last of these websites, Rotten Tomatoes (above), is a better version of the previous two websites combined. Rotten Tomatoes is a great place to go for honest reviews of current films, as well as box office information and news pertinent to the film. With the inclusion of Flash technology, the functionality of the site is great, as is the structure and visual design. However, the reviews are sometimes inconsistent, and there are a little too many advertisements and pop-ups that the reader must ignore in order to enjoy the site.

There are many magazines and newspapers that are either dedicated to or feature a film section, and there are only a few that are not only the best online representation of the publication, but also a great source for news and information on current and upcoming. Variety and The Hollywood Reporter are the go to industry-dedicated publications for both film and television, and are not to mention read habitually on a day-to-day basis by everyone in the film industry. The two sites are pretty similar, with only minor differences. Both sites feature a great visual design, structure, and easy navigability, and have sections that touch on virtually every aspect of the film industry, from reviews to festival information. The only detriments to these two sites are that the articles are not long enough, and that they focus more on day-to-day activities rather than pointing out trends and the direction of the entertainment industry. New York Times: Movies is a very well organized site that has some of the best content, and provides the reader with a very interactive and enjoyable experience. Articles are not limited to current or upcoming films like Ain’t It Cool News, and the scope of the articles is not limited to big budget or studio films. The Wall Street Journal Media and Marketing is a great site for readers who are interested in a much larger scope of information than the entertainment industry. While the content of its film articles are strong, the site’s content is much more focused (as it should be) on the business side of not just the film industry, but also the marketing and advertising industries in general, as well as technology and its influence on the media today. My only suggestion is that it should improve its current structure and organization. I think subsections or categories that organize the news by more specific industries would vastly help the readers’ navigation of the site. Empire is a film magazine that really excels in its content and interactivity. Articles are interesting and creative, and the site also features its own blog. Unlike Empire, Entertainment Weekly, another popular entertainment publication, has much more articles and also includes television and DVD in its scope, but the site is visually overwhelming, and many of the articles are simply pictures of celebrities or trivial lists such as “25 Butt-Kicking Babes”.

If a reader is looking for websites that are information based, IMDb.com and Box Office Mojo have the best database of film statistics and facts. IMDb.com is the most popular of the two, and while it does feature film reviews and minimal industry news, the site is primarily an encyclopedia or resume collection of all past, current, and future films. The visual design and depth of content is much better than that of Box Office Mojo, a site that has an extensive database of box office information for past and current films, but doesn’t feature much more than that. Due to the recent and pending strikes in the entertainment industry, I thought it important to feature websites of several organizations and guilds within the entertainment industry. The Writers Guild Of America(left) and The Directors Guild of America have websites with easy navigability and interesting perspective and content. However, The Directors Guild of America could use much improvement in visual design, and should also improve the organization of the site. The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences and the American Film Institute are two organizations with very informative sites. The Academy’s site could improve greatly if it simplified its home page by reducing the amount of links to other articles. However, the site has a great database for Oscar information, and also provides links to other very interesting organizations in the film industry. The American Film Institute also features an incredible database of information and many valuable lists of important films, but does not have enough news articles on its website.

While there are many other relevant and noteworthy websites, there are also a myriad of blogs about the entertainment industry that prove to be just as informative and stimulating as an online publication or organization. Movie Marketing Madness is an interesting blog that focuses on the marketing of current films, such as poster and trailer evaluation, advertising and marketing strategies, and the occasional review. However, the site does not engage the reader and does not provide enough links to other sources. Other blogs that provide information and updates on entertainment news within the blogosphere are The Hollywood Reporter: Risky Biz Blog and Slash Film: Movie Marketing. Both of these sites have interesting content and provide the reader with a very extensive list of other references, but both blogs also have a very poor visual design that leaves the reader ultimately unimpressed. The last blog I chose to highlight is from one of the blogs on Variety’s website, authored by the editor-in-chief of the magazine, entitled Peter Bart's Blog. This blog does not feature much day-to-day news, but provides the reader with creative and interesting articles they wouldn’t find anywhere else. While these blogs and websites are a mere sample of the plethora of sites on the Internet dedicated to film and the entertainment industry, hopefully this blog provided you with a convenient linkroll of websites that will give you a well-rounded education and update on the industry.
 
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License.